- by Sazragore
- 0 comments
Radiometric dating is a means of determining the "age" of a mineral specimen by determining the relative amounts present of certain radioactive elements. By "age" we mean the elapsed time from when the mineral specimen was formed. Radioactive elements "decay" that is, change into other elements by "half lives. The formula for the fraction remaining is one-half raised to the power given by the number of years divided by the half-life in other words raised to a power equal to the number of half-lives. If we knew the fraction of a radioactive element still remaining in a mineral, it would be a simple matter to calculate its age by the formula.
Certain plants existed at certain times, in certain places in the past. It also gives climate and environmental information, because those plants live in very specific climatic circumstances. Seriation- Analyzing the artifacts used at a site and placing them into categories according to times in the past they were traditionally used. Spearpoints, arrowheads, and pottery are the most likely candidates, as their technology, frequency, and style changes over time. When a new style is being developed, very few of the newer type will be found, but as the style gains widespread use, many will be found before they slowly disappear to make room for the ever-newer style.
Radiocarbon dating- C14 dating The most widely-known and used. All living things take in C14 as they live, and stop taking it in when they die. C14 decays at a known rate over time. By analyzing the amount of C14 left in dead material, you know that it died x number of years ago, within a possible date range. It's effective to about 50, years before present YBP. As a rule of thumb, a minimum of three separate samples must be taken from different remains at the site for a meaningful date.
This is often used in conjunction with Dendrochronology- Simply put, counting tree rings and analyzing that sample via radiocarbon dating. This gives a much closer approximation of the date of the material, called a "Calibrated Date.
Yes, billion. Fission Track Dating- This is relatively new. It measures the damage or tracks left by decaying uranium atoms in natural glasses such as obsidian and some minerals.
Obsidian Hydration Dating- Measures the amount of water absorbed by a piece of broken obsidian. Water works its way into a flintknapped or otherwise broken piece of obsidian at an observable rate. This can be measured simply using a microscope, where a small sample is taken from the artifact, or by using the much more technical and non-destructive and therefore better, but much more expensive Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry method.
This is used to date material as old as eight million YBP. Thermoluminescence TL - This method can only be used on burned materials like fire-cracked rock, pottery, and sediments exposed to sunlight. It measures the amount of accumulated radiation in an artifact or other sample. When the material is heated, it emits a small amount of light based on the amount of radiation stored within.
Radiometric dating example
This amount is measured. It is used to date material up to 50, YBP. Archaeomagnetic Dating- This depends upon the inclusion of magnetite within an artifact.
This is effective on material up to 10, YBP. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance- These are incredibly technical dating methods. They are based on the electron spin in an artifact by measuring the electromagnetic field of unpaired electrons in bone or calcite formation, and are effective from 1, to 2 million YBP.
Explain radioactive half-life and its role in radiometric dating; Calculate radioactive half-life and Nuclear decay is an example of a purely statistical process. Radiometric Dating: Methods, Uses & the Significance of Half-Life . uranium, and potassium are just a few examples of elements used in radioactive dating. Radioactive dating is very interesting because often this is where history and science mingle. One example of radioactive dating is carbon
Uranium has a measured radioactive decay into Thorium The isotope Uranium must also be measured against its parent isotope, Uranium, for an accurate measurement of radioactive decay. This is effective on any materials containing calcium carbonate- bones, mollusk shells, limestone, stalactites and stalagmites.
It is used to date materials up toYBP. Cosmogenic Nuclide Dating- This is an incredibly new process of dating. In one study, it measures the isotopes of Beryllium and the effects of cosmic rays, high-energy particles that come to Earth from space, causing the Beryllium to have differing numbers of neutrons. There are a total of 21 isotopes created by cosmic rays spread over a number of different elements.
Radiometric dating, radioactive dating or radioisotope dating is a technique which is used to . For example, the age of the Amitsoq gneisses from western Greenland was determined to be ± million years ago (MA) using uranium–lead. Radiometric dating is a means of determining the age of very old objects, including the Earth itself. Radiometric dating depends on the decay of. There are different methods of radiometric dating that will vary due to the type of material that is being dated. For example, uranium-lead dating can be used to.
This dating method is most often used in Geology, focusing on Aluminum, Chlorine, Calcium, and Iodine, which each have half-lifes of , , , and 15, years, respectively. Last edited: Feb 24, This article will also help you out, dealing with Forensic Archaeology, used by police to solve crimes. Andre said:. Apparently, thanks to nuclear bomb testing in the 40s, C dating can be used on recent teeth to date someone's year of birth within years.
Related Threads for: Cool examples of radiometric dating? Radiometric Dating. Posted Apr 22, Replies 2 Views 2K. Those of us who have developed and used dating techniques to solve scientific problems are well aware that the systems are not perfect; we ourselves have provided numerous examples of instances in which the techniques fail.
We often test them under controlled conditions to learn when and why they fail so we will not use them incorrectly. We have even discredited entire techniques. For example, after extensive testing over many years, it was concluded that uranium-helium dating is highly unreliable because the small helium atom diffuses easily out of minerals over geologic time. As a result, this method is not used except in rare and highly specialized applications.
These methods provide valuable and valid age data in most instances, although there is a small percentage of cases in which even these generally reliable methods yield incorrect results.
Such failures may be due to laboratory errors mistakes happenunrecognized geologic factors nature sometimes fools usor misapplication of the techniques no one is perfect.Radiometric Dating
Not only that, they have to show the flaws in those dating studies that provide independent corroborative evidence that radiometric methods work. This is a tall order and the creationists have made no progress so far. It is rare for a study involving radiometric dating to contain a single determination of age.
Usually determinations of age are repeated to avoid laboratory errors, are obtained on more than one rock unit or more than one mineral from a rock unit in order to provide a cross-check, or are evaluated using other geologic information that can be used to test and corroborate the radiometric ages. Scientists who use radiometric dating typically use every means at their disposal to check, recheck, and verify their results, and the more important the results the more they are apt to be checked and rechecked by others.
Radiometric Dating Does Work!
As a result, it is nearly impossible to be completely fooled by a good set of radiometric age data collected as part of a well-designed experiment. The purpose of this paper is to describe briefly a few typical radiometric dating studies, out of hundreds of possible examples documented in the scientific literature, in which the ages are validated by other available information.
I have selected four examples from recent literature, mostly studies involving my work and that of a few close colleagues because it was easy to do so. I could have selected many more examples but then this would have turned into a book rather than the intended short paper.
In the Cretaceous Period, a large meteorite struck the earth at a location near the present town of Manson, Iowa.
The heat of the impact melted some of the feldspar crystals in the granitic rocks of the impact zone, thereby resetting their internal radiometric clocks. The impact also created shocked quartz crystals that were blasted into the air and subsequently fell to the west into the inland sea that occupied much of central North America at that time. Today this shocked quartz is found in South Dakota, Colorado, and Nebraska in a thin layer the Crow Creek Member within a thick rock formation known as the Pierre Shale.
The Pierre Shale, which is divided into identifiable sedimentary beds called members, also contains abundant fossils of numerous species of ammonites, ancestors of the chambered nautilus. The fossils, when combined with geologic mapping, allow the various exposed sections of the Pierre Shale to be pieced together in their proper relative positions to form a complete composite section Figure 1.
The Pierre Shale also contains volcanic ash that was erupted from volcanoes and then fell into the sea, where it was preserved as thin beds. There are three important things to note about these results.
First, each age is based on numerous measurements; laboratory errors, had there been any, would be readily apparent. Second, ages were measured on two very different minerals, sanidine and biotite, from several of the ash beds. Third, the radiometric ages agree, within analytical error, with the relative positions of the dated ash beds as determined by the geologic mapping and the fossil assemblages; that is, the ages get older from top to bottom as they should.
Finally, the inferred age of the shocked quartz, as determined from the age of the melted feldspar in the Manson impact structure Meteorites, most of which are fragments of asteroids, are very interesting objects to study because they provide important evidence about the age, composition, and history of the early solar system. There are many types of meteorites. Some are from primitive asteroids whose material is little modified since they formed from the early solar nebula.
Others are from larger asteroids that got hot enough to melt and send lava flows to the surface. A few are even from the Moon and Mars.
The most primitive type of meteorites are called chondrites, because they contain little spheres of olivine crystals known as chondrules.
Because of their importance, meteorites have been extensively dated radiometrically; the vast majority appear to be 4. Some meteorites, because of their mineralogy, can be dated by more than one radiometric dating technique, which provides scientists with a powerful check of the validity of the results.
The results from three meteorites are shown in Table 1. Many more, plus a discussion of the different types of meteorites and their origins, can be found in Dalrymple There are 3 important things to know about the ages in Table 1.
The first is that each meteorite was dated by more than one laboratory — Allende by 2 laboratories, Guarena by 2 laboratories, and St Severin by four laboratories. This pretty much eliminates any significant laboratory biases or any major analytical mistakes.
The second thing is that some of the results have been repeated using the same technique, which is another check against analytical errors. The third is that all three meteorites were dated by more than one method — two methods each for Allende and Guarena, and four methods for St Severin.
This is extremely powerful verification of the validity of both the theory and practice of radiometric dating. In the case of St Severin, for example, we have 4 different natural clocks actually 5, for the Pb-Pb method involves 2 different radioactive uranium isotopeseach running at a different rate and each using elements that respond to chemical and physical conditions in much different ways.
And yet, they all give the same result to within a few percent. Is this a remarkable coincidence? Scientists have concluded that it is not; it is instead a consequence of the fact that radiometric dating actually works and works quite well. Creationists who wants to dispute the conclusion that primitive meteorites, and therefore the solar system, are about 4. One of the most exciting and important scientific findings in decades was the discovery that a large asteroid, about 10 kilometers diameter, struck the earth at the end of the Cretaceous Period.
The collision threw many tons of debris into the atmosphere and possibly led to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other life forms. The fallout from this enormous impact, including shocked quartz and high concentrations of the element iridium, has been found in sedimentary rocks at more than locations worldwide at the precise stratigraphic location of the Cretaceous-Tertiary K-T boundary Alvarez and Asaro ; Alvarez We now know that the impact site is located on the Yucatan Peninsula.
Measuring the age of this impact event independently of the stratigraphic evidence is an obvious test for radiometric methods, and a number of scientists in laboratories around the world set to work. In addition to shocked quartz grains and high concentrations of iridium, the K-T impact produced tektites, which are small glass spherules that form from rock that is instantaneously melted by a large impact.
The K-T tektites were ejected into the atmosphere and deposited some distance away. Tektites are easily recognizable and form in no other way, so the discovery of a sedimentary bed the Beloc Formation in Haiti that contained tektites and that, from fossil evidence, coincided with the K-T boundary provided an obvious candidate for dating. Scientists from the US Geological Survey were the first to obtain radiometric ages for the tektites and laboratories in Berkeley, Stanford, Canada, and France soon followed suit.
The results from all of the laboratories were remarkably consistent with the measured ages ranging only from Similar tektites were also found in Mexico, and the Berkeley lab found that they were the same age as the Haiti tektites. The K-T boundary is recorded in numerous sedimentary beds around the world. Numerous thin beds of volcanic ash occur within these coals just centimeters above the K-T boundary, and some of these ash beds contain minerals that can be dated radiometrically.
Since both the ash beds and the tektites occur either at or very near the K-T boundary, as determined by diagnostic fossils, the tektites and the ash beds should be very nearly the same age, and they are Table 2. There are several important things to note about these results. First, the Cretaceous and Tertiary periods were defined by geologists in the early s.
So, I know that C dating is being used now to solve crimes/identify bodies. Any other examples of it being used for things besides dating. Radiocarbon Dating is the process of determining the age of a sample by examining the amount of C remaining against the known half-life. Using relative and radiometric dating methods, geologists are able to answer the For example, based on the primate fossil record, scientists know that living.
The boundary between these periods the K-T boundary is marked by an abrupt change in fossils found in sedimentary rocks worldwide. Its exact location in the stratigraphic column at any locality has nothing to do with radiometric dating — it is located by careful study of the fossils and the rocks that contain them, and nothing more.
Furthermore, the dating was done in 6 different laboratories and the materials were collected from 5 different locations in the Western Hemisphere. And yet the results are the same within analytical error.
In the early afternoon of August 24, 79 CE, Mt Vesuvius erupted violently, sending hot ash flows speeding down its flanks. These flows buried and destroyed Pompeii and other nearby Roman cities.
We know the exact day of this eruption because Pliny the Younger carefully recorded the event.